Costa Rican’s society should have a paternity leave policy as a part of the legal parental benefits provided by the government, if politicians are authentically committed to promote human investment and social development. Inconveniently, even though Costa Rica’s society in general seems to be receptive to the idea of having a paternity leave policy, the Costa Rican government does not think over the importance to Costa Rica’s children to be supported by both parents ― not only the mother ― in the nursing process, specially in the early years. Fortunately, not all the countries around the world adopt the same stance on that. Indeed, the European Union (EU) has included this relevant and progressive social assistance by reforming the former labor legislation of each nation member. In spite of that legal reformation, none of the European Union’s members regrets that decision because of the positive impact in child’s health and family’s stability reported by all those nations (EUROFOUND, 2006). Therefore, should
The Government of Costa Rica should establish a paternity leave policy because of two main reasons. First at all, paternity leave redeems the importance of the father’s presence for the child. This condition represents its best strength because it highlights the unique benefits from father’s affection for children’s mental stability and health. Regarding a “research context” (Ruhn, p.2), the father’s presence at home during early years “emphasizes the long-lasting effects of early environmental influences on brain development” in children (Rhun, p. 2). Secondly, this initiative would provide gender equality for Costa Rican society, not only at work but also at home. In others words, such a social benefit promotes the necessary setting for sharing family responsibilities for taking care of children and home.
The main counter-argument some people may argue is that the mother is more important for children because she is the one who feeds the baby. Diametrically opposed, feeding the baby is not the only responsibility that parents are supposed to have. For instance, love, care, and protection are as important as feeding. In addition, some others say that paternity leave would be too expensive for the companies and the state. On the contrary, this social initiative helps the economy because much more women would have the advantage of getting a job more easily, even if they do not want to have children ever. Unfortunately, there are always been employers that only think of money ignoring employee’s rights. However, they must be denounced because disrespecting labor rights ― as parental leave, in general ― is an illegal practice. Another common counter-argument refers to the belief that the mother is the one in charge of raising the children. Nevertheless, this is no more than an old and chauvinistic way of thinking. Indeed, there are about 3% of fathers ― considered as good or adequate ones ― who raise their children alone because the mother has left the family, and “over 70 percent of fathers (living in couple) with the right to the paid leave took it” in 1997, according to Norwegian’s national statistics.
Paternity leave allows the father’s presence during the early years which constitutes a significant investment in child development, focusing on the role of dynamic complementarities between the father and the mother. Considerations only based on monetary policies must be taken out from people’s mind ― specially politicians ― to start having a better country to live. It is definitively Costa Rica’s people’s responsibility not only to urge the government and the National Parliament to pass a paternity leave act but also to make them think over about the benefits that this leave would bring for Costa Rica’s families and Costa Rica’s society in general.
Manuel Soto

"I totally agree with the idea of having a paternity leave in Costa Rica. If people here want to have a country with real gender equality, it is essential to accept the importance of the partipipation of father for the child. Also, the resposibility of taking care of the child´s needs is a job for both (mother-father). "
ReplyDeleteThe arrival of a new member to the family is absolutely exciting. However, it also carries lots of anxiety for the new parents. It is of great importante the presence of the male in order to take care of the baby and the mother the first days after child birth. The father can be helping the mother providing emocional, psychological and physical support. I agree with paternity leave because the government should implement this policy to be applied in private companies to cooperate with family integration and adjustment for both parents and the baby.
ReplyDeleteBy: Lorena Fallas
This idea seems completely right to me, and I actually find it hard to understand that many countries around the world, including Costa Rica, have not yet accepted such policy. Both father and mother are responsible of raising the child, and I'm sure that both consider it a privilege, so why taking this experience from the father? In my opinion, paternity leave should definitely be accepted in our country.
ReplyDeleteBy: Daniela Arguello